Person B may believe that selective abortion of the "imperfect" is a form of murder or unjustifiable discrimination or both. It Depends on Your Religion.
We shall ignore arguments about cloning that focus on the potential for harm to the fetus or resultant human [End Page ] being, where harm is understood solely in terms of physical and mental health.
Indeed, for any purported harm that may come from cloning whether physical, psychological, or emotionalit must be argued why those harms are sufficient for banning reproductive cloning if comparable harm would not be sufficient for banning any other kind of reproductive method, whether natural or artificial Harris, ; Robertson, They had these embryos tested, and genomes checked.
Only if I have harmed someone can my action be deemed morally wrong. Creating a child via cloning does not entail that there is a lack of mutual love between the parents, or that the resulting child would be any less loved Strong, It would be extremely unlikely that a clone of Beethoven could compose a tenthsymphony.
Or, perhaps one of the prospective parents is predisposed to certain genetic disorders and, in order to completely avoid their offspring inheriting these disorders, they decide to clone the other prospective parent.
Would there be any reason to disallow it? Because this kind of cloning does not result in the genesis of a human organism, it has no reproductive intent or goals, and it does not result in the creation and destruction of embryos, there is little to no contention regarding its use.
The Ethics of Genetic Control.
It does this by allowing scientists to remove or create new cells. Which is more normal or desirable: Yet, we can look towards the children who are products of modern day artificial reproduction in order to see that such a concern is not supported by the evidence. Policy and social changes that protect lesbian and gay families are a much more pressing need.
What is your response? Cloning techniques will eventually be perfected in mammals and will then be suitable for human trials.
A Brief History InHans Driesch cloned a sea urchin through inducing twinning by shaking an embryonic sea urchin in a beaker full of sea water until the embryo cleaved into two distinct embryos. What do you think? Given the current level of cloning technology concerning other animals there is every reason to believe that early human clones will have shorter-than-average life-spans, and will be unusually prone to disease.
A negative right to x means that no one has the prima facie right to interfere in your request to fulfill x. Types of Cloning a. The great majority of people have an intuitive sense that human beings should not be cloned. Arguments for "Reproductive" Cloning The widespread unease, fear, and revulsion that most Americans feel at the idea of cloning human beings is undeniable.
Two points should be made. Cloning and Savior Siblings The Argument. Many philosophers and ethicists who would otherwise support reproductive cloning concede that concern for the safety of children born via cloning is reason to caution against its use Harris, ; Glannon, Before she died, she produced six healthy lambs through natural reproduction.Arguments against cloning appeal to concerns about a clone’s lack of genetic uniqueness and what may be implied because of this.
Human cloning is of special interest.
Arguments in Favor of Reproductive Cloning and Responses a. Reproductive Liberty: The Only Way to Have a Genetically Related Child. The Argument. The Andrews Report lists some arguments against human cloning. (a) Cloning would be unsafe. (b) There is no medical need for cloning.
(c) Cloning would constitute an infringement of human dignity, that is a cloned child could be a means to an end.
Whereas defenders of cloning have tended to dismiss the arguments against cloning, while elevating the desirability of allowing people to do what they want, several of the arguments against cloning, none of which shows that it is wrong, articulate values with which it is likely to conflict in practice.
The paper is divided into two distinct sections, 3a and 3b, which present the case in favor of and against "reproductive" cloning, respectively. 3a. Reasons For and Against Human Cloning Recently, the controversy around human cloning has received a lot of news coverage; yet unsurprisingly, a clear and thorough examination of both sides has been lacking from the news media.
Arguments Against Reproductive Cloning 1. Reproductive cloning would foster an understanding of children, and of people in general, as objects that can be designed and manufactured to possess specific characteristics.Download